Specific data points need to be identified for extraction along with any potential “keys” to integrate across disparate source systems. The ETL process, on the other hand, requires more definition at the onset. ELT can be more ideal for big data management since it doesn’t need much upfront planning for data extraction and storage. ELT is particularly useful for high-volume, unstructured datasets as loading can occur directly from the source. While both processes leverage a variety of data repositories, such as databases, data warehouses, and data lakes, each process has its advantages and disadvantages. ELT copies or exports the data from the source locations, but instead of loading it to a staging area for transformation, it loads the raw data directly to the target data store to be transformed as needed. ELT, on the other hand = Extract, Load, Transform.Īccording to IBM, “the most obvious difference between ETL and ELT is the difference in order of operations. Data loading describes the insertion of data into the target data store, data mart, data lake or data warehouse.Ī properly designed ETL system extracts data from the source systems, enforces data quality and consistency standards, conforms data so that separate sources can be used together, and finally delivers data in a presentation-ready format.“Īs stated above, ETL = Extract, Transform, Load.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |